It’s not uncommon for me to spend many a late hour pondering the nature of existence and death instead of sleeping, tonight being more of the former than the latter. This often results in me sleeping late and being groggy all day, with breif spots of caffeinated clarity.
The main topic of discussion I have had with myself in tonight’s session is how we percieve time.
Think about how long it has been since your last meal. How do you assertain that distance of time (if distance is the appropriate word… )? You can look at your watch and do the math to come with a more precise answer, but generally one can “feel” how long it has been.
You might say it “feels” like a few hours or it “feels” like a few minutes, but that gut-feeling might sometimes be off. You might look at the actual amount of time passed and be surprised to find “time has flown” or “time is dragging”.
It all got me thinking about how the concept of how long a stretch of time “feels”. Is it almost innate and inborn like a sense, like sight? Is it a perceptual construct learned through experience, like learning a language or how to walk?
It may have something to do with memory. When your mind stores in information about your experiences, does it also attach some kind of “time stamp” that is used for knowing when something occured, is it stored in some sequential pattern that can be used to deduce when something happened, or is the sense of when something happened just a random blurb of information we store away, like the colors and smells we encounter.
In the end, memory seems to me to be the key to our perception of time. When time seems to fly, perhaps it is because less memories were stored than normal, due to the brain focusing on thought and perception than internal processing and storage. This thought reminded me about an old mind stretcher I had come up with during my more avante garde days: What if time is not sequential, or what if time takes a 1000 year break between every second? We would never know, because our brains would only be recording new experiences when time was actually moving and that information would be stored sequentially, making us oblivous to time doing anything unusual.
When we sleep it may seem like dreams only last a few minutes or seconds, but brain scans of sleeping people show that we may actually dream for hours; we just do not form memories of those experiences, making it seem like only a brief bit of time had passed.
Time could be flowing backwards and we would never know. Our memories would still be recorded in the current fashion. In the end, how do we know time did not actually start a few seconds ago, the universe actaully starting in this current state along with our memories of past experiences.
Well, enough about memory and time, for it is time for me to get some sleep. Sweet dreams, night watchers, and keep watching the stars. 

DKG
March 29th, 2006 at 2:29 am
An article by Dr. Susan Blackmore, [URL link="http://www.susanblackmore.co.uk/Articles/jcs02.htm"]“THERE IS NO STREAM OF CONSCIOUSNESS”[/URL] may shed some light on your questions. In fact, she has a nice metaphor of determining if the light in the refrigerator is always on by opening the door repeatedly. This can be seen as the same thing as repeatedly checking to see if you are conscious at a particular moment and of what. Of course you always find that you are conscious, but was that perception generated by your brain in response to your consciousness check? Will you find you were conscious of multiple things at once in different sensory modalities depending which questions you ask yourself?
Charles
March 29th, 2006 at 1:01 pm
[:BL:]There are only two ways in which we can account for a necessary agreement of experience with the concepts of its objects: either experience makes these concepts possible or these concepts make experience possible.
[:B:]Immanuel Kant[/:B:]
“Critique of Pure Reason”
[/:BL:]
arctophile
April 25th, 2006 at 12:30 pm
Time could be flowing backwards and we would never know.
>>> I don’t know what you mean by “time” in this statement. For example, if my clock is running backwards I would know by observing my clock.
Charles
April 25th, 2006 at 1:07 pm
Well, to be perfectly honest I don’t know what I mean by “time” either.
I guess that’s what I am trying to figure out, what specifically time is.
You can say time is another direction of space, but in the end what does that mean? Are there multiple dimensions of time? What makes that direction so special as to disallow travel backwards? Did the big bang force all matter in our universe forward in time while the rest of the matter remained in the past?
I’ve often thought about Quantum Theory and time passing backwards. Supposidly all things exist in all potential positions and states until a conscious observer collapses the quantum wave via the act of observation. I think this kind of thing would make more sense if time actually flowed backwards, with only one possibility existing after observation and all other possibilities branching out backwards through time.